Writing Rules

All submissions to Respolitica undergo a multi-stage evaluation process to ensure scientific quality and academic standards.

In the first stage, articles submitted to the journal are subject to a preliminary review by the editorial board. At this stage, the suitability of the work for the journal’s aims and scope, compliance with the style guidelines, and basic academic adequacy are assessed. Manuscripts deemed unsuitable following the preliminary review may be rejected without proceeding to the peer review process.

Manuscripts that pass the preliminary review are sent to at least two independent referees in accordance with the double-blind peer review principle. During this process, the identities of the authors and referees are kept confidential from one another. The referees evaluate the manuscripts in terms of scientific originality, methodological soundness, contribution to the literature, and academic ethical principles.

Based on the reviewers’ reports, a decision of “acceptance”, “revision” (minor/major revisions) or “rejection” is made regarding the article. Authors are expected to complete the revisions requested by the reviewers within the specified timeframe and provide the necessary explanations. Where deemed necessary, revised manuscripts may be sent for further peer review.

In the event of significant discrepancies between the reviewers’ opinions, the editorial board may seek additional peer review. The final decision is made by the editorial board.

The average review process at Respolitica takes between 4 and 8 weeks.

Respolitica attaches great importance to the confidentiality and impartiality of the review process, as well as its adherence to academic ethical principles. The meticulous conduct of the peer-review process is one of the key elements in safeguarding the journal’s scientific integrity.